Question Description
This paper is to be written in APA format.
- This paper is expected to be no more than four pages in length (not including the title page and reference list).
- Please use the categories listed below as the first level headings for each section of your paper(Exception: Instead of “Introduction” please use the title of your paper).
Content Guidelines
Using the information gathered in your Genetic Family History and Milestone 1 assignments, you will identify and research one modifiable risk factor. You will develop an evidence-based teaching plan that promotes health, with the aim of improving patient outcomes related to this modifiable risk factor.
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Identify and research one modifiable risk factor.
Just from $13/Page
- Introduction (1 paragraph): The introduction should be interesting and capture the reader’s attention.
- State one preventable disease your adult participant is at risk for developing (obesity, etc.), based on the information you have gathered during this course.
- Introduce one modifiable risk factor (diet, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, etc.) associated with the preventable disease you described.
- Clearly state the purpose of your paper. The purpose statement should relate to developing a patient teaching plan.
- Preventable Disease Overview (1-2 paragraphs): Please use course materials and scholarly sources to complete this section. Be sure to paraphrase and include citations as needed!
- Describe briefly the preventable disease you identified in the introduction.
- What are the signs and symptoms associated with this disease?
- How is it diagnosed? Notable information from Health History and General Survey? Signs and symptoms? Risk assessments? Lab values?
- What physical assessment findings would be associated with this disease?
- How did you identify your adult participant’s risk for this disease?
- Specific information gathered in the Genetic Family History?
- Specific information gathered in the Milestone 1 assignment?
- Describe briefly the preventable disease you identified in the introduction.
- Evidence Based Intervention (1-2 paragraphs):
- Choose and describe one evidence based intervention related to the modifiable risk factoryou have chosen. (One that has been shown to be effective at reducing an individual’s risk for developing the preventable disease.)
- Describe this intervention in detail, and provide rationale for your intervention utilizing:
- At least one scholarly peer-reviewed journal article. Search peer reviewed journals to find a scholarly article that discusses interventions associated with the modifiable risk factor you have chosen as the focus of your paper. Summarize what you learned from this article and cite the source in the text and reference page (Author, year). The article must be less than 10 years old. You may include and cite your textbook or other scholarly sources as well, but they do notcount as the scholarly journal article.
- You must summarize and analyze the information from your sources in your own words. Avoid direct quotations. If you do include a short quotation, be sure to cite it properly.
- List short and long term goals you have for your participant related to this intervention.
- Implementation: Teaching Plan (1-2 paragraphs):
- Discuss in this section what methods you will use to teach your participant how to implement the intervention.
- What is it that you are asking them to do? (For example, if your intervention is “quit smoking”, what specific steps will you recommend your participant take to achieve this goal?)
- Describe any resources you would provide to the participant to help them understand and be successful (websites, community services, handouts, etc.).
- Evaluation (1 paragraph):
- Describe at least one method (weight, lab values, etc.) you would use to evaluate whether your intervention was effective.
- How would you revise you plan if it proved to be unsuccessful?
- Summary (1 paragraph):
- Summarize the main points of your paper.
- Reiterate what you hope to accomplish by implementing this intervention.
- End with a concluding statement.
- Reference Page:
- The Reference Page should start on a new page (insert a page break).
- All references should be cited within the body of the paper as (Author, year) and the full reference should be included in APA format on the reference page.
- A URL link alone is not an adequate reference.
Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionThe introduction -catches the reader’s attention, -states one preventable disease -correctly identifies one modifiable risk factor associated with the disease -includes a purpose. | 20.0 ptsThe introduction catches the reader’s attention, states one preventable disease, correctly identifies one modifiable risk factor associated with the disease, and includes a purpose.18.0 ptsThe introduction is missing one of the elements listed in the first column.16.0 ptsThe introduction is missing two elements listed in the first column.8.0 ptsThe introduction is missing three elements listed in the first column.0.0 ptsNo introduction is present. | 20.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreventable Disease OverviewCorrectly identifies a preventable disease and provides a brief description including signs and symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and how the adult participant was identified to be at risk. | 30.0 ptsCorrectly identifies a preventable disease and provides a brief description including signs and symptoms, how it is diagnosed, and how the adult participant was identified to be at risk.26.0 ptsAll elements in the first column included but discussion of one or more items lacks detail.24.0 ptsOne of the elements in the first column is missing.11.0 ptsTwo of the elements in the first column are missing.0.0 ptsThere is no preventable disease overview. | 30.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Based InterventionOne evidenced based intervention (related to the modifiable risk factor) is described thoroughly AND rationale for the intervention is supported by one relevant peer reviewed journal AND short term and long term goals are listed. | 40.0 ptsOne evidenced based intervention (related to the modifiable risk factor) is described thoroughly AND rationale for the intervention is supported by one relevant peer reviewed journal AND short term and long term goals are listed.35.0 ptsAdequately describes the evidence based intervention, peer reviewed article is relevant and shows support for the intervention and short and long term goals are present.32.0 ptsOne of the elements in the first column is missing.15.0 ptsTwo of the elements in the first column are missing.0.0 ptsThere is no evidence-based intervention provided. | 40.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeaching PlanMethods for teaching the participant how to implement the intervention are described in detail, including resources to be provided to the participant. | 40.0 ptsMethods for teaching the participant how to implement the intervention are described in detail, including resources to be provided to the participant.35.0 ptsMethods of teaching the participant how to the implement the intervention are described adequately, including resources to be provided. 35 points ☐32.0 ptsMethods of teaching the participant how to the implement the intervention are adequately described, but with no mention of resources to be provided.15.0 ptsThere is brief mention of a teaching plan, with no mention of resources to be provided.0.0 ptsA teaching plan is not discussed. | 40.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluationShort term and long term goals restated AND at least one appropriate method of evaluation is described in detail AND a plan is described if the adult participant was unsuccessful. | 30.0 ptsShort term and long term goals restated AND at least one appropriate method of evaluation is described in detail AND a plan is described if the adult participant was unsuccessful.26.0 ptsShort term and long term goals restated, and adequately describes an evaluation plan, including if participant is unsuccessful.24.0 ptsOne of the elements in the first column is missing or not addressed with sufficient detail.11.0 ptsTwo of the elements in the first column are missing or not addressed with sufficient detail.0.0 ptsAn evaluation plan is not discussed. | 30.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummaryMain points of the paper are summarized, including reiteration of what is hoped to be accomplished. Ends with a concluding statement. | 20.0 ptsMain points of the paper are summarized, including reiteration of what is hoped to be accomplished. Ends with a concluding statement.18.0 ptsSummary mostly reiterates the main points of the presentation and concludes with a description of what is hoped to be accomplished. Ends with a concluding sentence.16.0 ptsBrief summary captures a few of the main points, briefly describes what is hoped to be accomplished. Concluding sentence may or may not be present.8.0 ptsSummary is present but fails to capture the main points and lacks a description of what is hoped to be accomplished. Lacks concluding sentence.0.0 ptsSummary is not present. | 20.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and organizationExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly. | 25.0 ptsExcellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly.22.0 ptsGood mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. A few errors noted.20.0 ptsFair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Some errors noted.10.0 ptsPoor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column. Many errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the first column such that it is difficult to follow or understand. | 25.0pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA FormatExcellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: all sources cited in the assignment in APA format, all references listed on the reference page in APA format, title page in general APA format, headings present and in APA format, 12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented, no more than one short quotation, and length four pages or less | 20.0 ptsExcellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: all sources cited in the assignment in APA format, all references listed on the reference page in APA format, title page in general APA format, headings present and in APA format, 12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented, no more than one short quotation, and length four pages or less18.0 ptsGood APA formatting considering the elements listed in the first column. A few APA errors noted.16.0 ptsFair APA formatting considering the elements listed in the first column. Some APA errors noted.8.0 ptsPoor APA formatting considering the elements listed in the first column. Many APA errors noted.0.0 ptsVery poor APA formatting such that paper is difficult to read. Numerous APA errors noted |
